I wish that I could say I’ve been far too busy writing the great American novel or screenplay to keep up with my mundane thoughts and retarded perusals. I wish that taking time off from chatting about my vagina meant I’d been doing something constructive like learning to tat lace or drive a tractor but the truth of the matter is – I just didn’t have anything to say – until now. Who gave Michael Vick a dog? Can someone please explain to me how a man who served time in a federal prison for running a brutal dog fighting ring where innocent animals were maimed, drowned if they didn’t perform or killed deserves to be the owner of a dog? Clearly as a society, we’ve gone mad. Some douchebag idiot wrote an editorial for The Los Angeles Times saying they think it’s perfectly okay to let this animal have a pet. They say “Vick has served his time and should be allowed to re-integrate into society.” I’m sorry – I didn’t know owning a dog was a part of societal reintegration? I thought – getting to live in your house and not being ass fucked in prison was. They also wrote that they think we should “give him a chance to prove himself” and that “surely his neighbors will be watching.” Really? Is this how we handle child molesters and abusers? Let’s give them a kid and see how it goes because surely their neighbors will be watching. I guess it’s okay to go with this see how it goes theory because after all it’s only a dog. What’s the worst that could happen? Another dog gets killed? We already kill millions a year. Maybe this is a theory we should test in other areas? Let’s allow Casey Anthony to adopt. Maybe we should have let Jeffrey Dahmer have a boyfriend in prison. Perhaps Westley Allen Dodd just needed a few more kids to prove he wasn’t evil. Nothing funny here folks. Just idiocy.